W3C mailing list search service

Search among 2,298,441 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:

Keywords

Subject

From

Lists to search

All Public lists

Specific lists

Specific lists to search

Advanced search options

Time Period

Month

Year

Results per page

Sort by

Message-ID

Clear all

This is page 1, displaying results 1-50 of 3024

added priorVersion link to daml+oil

List: public-webont-comments
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:32:08 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Following the example in 6. Ontology Versioning http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/#OntologyVersioning The OWL namespace document has been updated to show daml+oil as a priorVersion of

progress on MeetingRecords, trouble migrating from cyc:subEvents to sumo:part

List: www-rdf-calendar
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:20:55 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Adam, calendar folks, Calendars have a certain overlap with http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords Charles and I were talking about representing action items as ical:Vtodo objects. I started in that

agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Sep

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:59:09 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-09-07 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")

RE: Grammar for DAWG query language

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:05:11 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Steve ntoed that SOURCE distributes over triples; i.e. SOURCE ?RECORD { meeting date ?WHEN. meeting chair ?WHO } is the same query as SOURCE ?RECORD ( meeting date ?WHEN) SOURCE ?RECORD ( meeting cha

[closed] Re: Fwd: re: reminder of goals/vision for site redesign project

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:50:35 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

not a comment on webarch -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBWD

[closed]: Fwd: re: reminder of goals/vision for site redesign project

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:51:07 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

not a comment on webarch -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBWD

"AWWW, 20040816 release, sections 1 and 2" seems editorial

List: www-tag
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:08:37 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

In our 13 Sep telcon, I took an action to propose a response to "AWWW, 20040816 release, sections 1 and 2" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JulSep/0059.html I just look

Re: editorial [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch]

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:59:11 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Norm seems to have addressed these in a 3Sep edit of http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch/ (specifically, 1.713 of http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch/webarch.html) and replied... http://lists.w3.org/Ar

[closed]: editorial [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch]

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:14:30 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

You're welcome. This sub-thread is now closed. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5

Re: Cyberspace analogous to set of all sets: URIs & URLs

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:24:32 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

It's not clear to me what changes we could make to the document to address your comments. Could you be more specific about which sections you're commenting on? http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ [...] The

Re: F2F3 notes

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:02:15 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Thanks, but I think DaveB already provided most of that stuff (and I put it in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs#qlsyn ) The @@ in the meeting record refers to some live-editing you did o

Re: URI Renting Re: minutes: TAG teleconference 2004-09-13 for review

List: www-tag
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:55:33 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

I can explain where I got this information: "you really are owner of your domain, as explained on point 1 of our contract," -- http://gandi.net/whowe.html.en "I. USE OF DOMAIN NAME AND GANDI SERVICES

Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:54:32 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Umm... when you forward these, ideally, I'd like to see a proposed reply... or at least some thoughts of your own on the matter. The raw bits are already available to the WG, just a few clicks from t

Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-09-28

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:00:46 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Thanks for the timely minutes. I have a couple smallish corrections to offer... [...] That action CONTINUES, as you note below. We noted that DONE, as I recall; discharged by: -- Dan Connolly, W3C ht

RE: A few simple tests

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:23:08 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Has anybody else tried these? EricP, I'd like to see the WG resolve to adopt these tests in the upcoming telcon. That reminds me... there were various loose ends w.r.t. our discussion of these tests

no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:13 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

I just checked for news in the SPARQL draft http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ and I see $Revision: 1.67 $ with the new name, abstract and such. Good... I suggest dropping the issues appendix

unsaid/not: any champions?

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:50:35 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

If anyone would champion this feature, let him/her speak now... or soon (in the next few weeks)... or... wait until after we get a 1st version of SPARQL to REC. It's also in order to propose that UNS

Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?] (s/model/graph/g)

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:03:56 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Let's please use standard terminology in our discussions. I let this go a few times at the ftf, and I'm having trouble following the SOURCE discussions in part because I think folks are neglecting to

RE: no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:40:12 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Yes, that's the issue, no? Hmm... I can't confirm from any records, but that's the issue I mean for the WG to consider. That's not something I'm inclined to make an issue out of; that's sort of an ob

Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:06:04 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

cool. Hmm... the hello world example involves returning bNodes from the query. Maybe that could be pushed to a later example? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 60

Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:15:11 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Really? I can't think of an algorithm for the simplest case: (<book1> dc:title "War and Peace") OR (<book2> tc:title "Moby Dick") Oh.. you mean you turn it into *multiple* queries. Maybe I see. Don't

Re: draft XML query results format spec

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:21:12 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Hmm... That's clever. The question is whether it's too clever. It sets off my use/mention sensor somehow... the var:hpage property is relating a solution to... a web page, not to a graph term. Also,

Re: CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:13:25 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Take care with use/mention issues... I think CBD is defined in terms of syntactic terms, T1, rather than resources, R1. i.e. triples with T1 as the subject... [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3

Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:15:07 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Yes, if you're confident the change will be an improvement. It's also OK for you to say "hmm... good idea, but I'm not confident we can do it and do it well in this release." I thought about it for 2

ode to a closet librarian

List: www-archive
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:03:43 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Cleaning my office, throwing out hardcopies; can't bear to not record at least a reference to them... * HTTP 1.1 draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-06 * GWM Manual -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People

ode to a closet librarian (take 2)

List: www-archive
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:55:53 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Cleaning my office, throwing out hardcopies; I once cared about these enough to print them out and/or carry them from Cambridge to Austin to Kansas City; can't bear to not record at least a reference

agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Aug

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:08:41 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-10-12 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, co

minutes Basel ftf 5-7 Oct 2004 for review

List: www-tag
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:10:44 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

TAG members, please review: Basel Meeting of the W3C Technical Architecture Group, 5-7 Sep 2004 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag created by Stuart Williams, TAG co-chair DRAFT minutes by

RE: minutes Basel ftf 5-7 Oct 2004 for review

List: www-tag
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:10:04 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

yes, thanks. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag 1.35 2004/10/11 16:59:26 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PG

Re: Your comments on Character Model Fundamentals [LC043, LC044, LC046, LC047]

List: www-i18n-comments
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:44:32 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Thanks much. Very well, "require or depend on" makes sense. No, I'm not satisfied by the rationale for not defining "character" once and for all. charmod defines code-point, and a character is exactl

[closed]: Some Phone Links

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:34:09 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

spam. not a comment on webarch. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8

Re: Simple source tests (file: URIs in test materials)

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:46:35 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

URIs of this form look odd to me... <file:simple-data-1.n3> why not just <simple-data-1.n3>? or a full http-based URI? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541

Re: WebArch draft, 14 Oct 2004

List: www-archive
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:49:43 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

In 1.1 I still see "... in accordance with RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. However ..." Did you change your mind, or forget? "After discussion, it seemed that the use of these keywords in webarch is as appropria

RE: Use of "assign" for URI -> resource

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:34:49 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

I think I can arrange for that; Should we be looking at revised drafts, or just the RFCs? http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2717.html Nov 1999 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2718.html Nov 1999 Is a review in

agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:12:44 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-10-19 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, co

Re: protocol draft -- update

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:33:07 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Thanks for the heads-up. No, I can't think of any. Hmm... the agenda I just sent is missing your action; I wonder where it got dropped... I'll try to see that it gets in the minutes. Feel free to hel

Re: too positive on extensibility [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch]

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:53:10 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

I think Chris meant to direct this to you, Dom... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.2

Re: KD014 Media types for XML

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:57:39 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Karl, I believe Chris meant this for you. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/

Re: WebArch draft, 14 Oct 2004

List: www-tag
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:01:52 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Essentially, yes; perhaps you're in the mood to inser a paragraph break or do the transition some other way, as long as it doesn't convey that webarch is an exception to RFC2119. -- Dan Connolly, W3C

minutes: TAG 18 Oct 2004 for review

List: www-tag
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:06:05 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

--=-ul3yZlUjDXN8J6Wngg/0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TAG Weekly Teleconference 18 Oct 2004 Present: Norm, TimBL, Chris, Stuart, Noah (parts), DanC, Roy, PaulC

Re: revert recent timezone changes? put them in a new schema?

List: www-rdf-calendar
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:25:55 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Hmm... it seems that I never actually rolled them forward in the 1st place. I proposed the changes 14 Apr 2004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Apr/0022.html but the schema is

Re: Thank you, Roy [was: Re: FW: Protocol Action: 'Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): ...]

List: uri
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:31:37 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Yes, thanks a bunch for sticking with it to the finish, Roy. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version:

Re: FW: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-00.txt]

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:04:50 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Hmm... I'm reluctant to add dependencies at this point, but I can see your point. Hmm... Thanks for the pointers. [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C54

definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]]

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:01:24 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

[...] It doesn't? Where does the spec say that? Surely SELECT is a projection, which, in typical cases, does change the number of items in the set. Hmm... the definitions seem to stop after "Definiti

Re: Representation of a secondary resource?

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:25:40 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Yes, this section needed work. After consideration of yours and other comments, we've revised the text: [[ The terms �primary� and �secondary� in this context do not limit the nature of the resource�

Re: KD 002 [was: Comments on Web Arch WD - 2004-07-05]

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:37:25 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

After consideration of your comment, we added some text to clarify: "To achieve this goal, the Web makes use of a single global identification system: the URI. URIs are a cornerstone of Web architect

[closed] Re: new text for Information Resource (section 3.1)

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:57:20 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Thanks for the detailed review and suggestions. Ah; thanks. I'll try to be sure that gets fixed. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C

[Fwd: Re: KD007 Assertion that two URIs identify the same resource]

List: www-archive
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:30:19 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

--=-he+5iAtyEHCBjyqPz96c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was going to tell Karl "it already does say this" but the relevant text is in the future

Re: HTML WG last call comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/

List: public-webarch-comments
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:27:08 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

How unfortunate. I wonder... is the HTML WG aware of the extent to which The Director overrulled oustanding dissent in the history of the development of HTML? HTML 3.2 and HTML 4.0 were developed bef

input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL?

List: public-rdf-dawg
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:01:12 -0500
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Ooops. "This is a W3C Last Call Working Draft. [...] Comments can be sent until 4 October 2004." -- Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language W3C Working Draft 3 Augu

Pagination

1
2
3
4
5
…
Last
Next

Help and hints for using this service

W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.